Compensation Policy Considerations - Macro Level & Micro Level
Compensation policies at the company level are
subject to the overall legislative and other mandatory principles/framework
established by the Government.
A variety of considerations, both objective and
subjective, weigh the determination of compensation policies at the company
level.
• There
is a need for a fit between organization design and company policies.
• Companies
also need to consider the policies of other companies,
• the
pressures of collective bargaining (for unionized staff) and the profile and
expectations of the workforce.
• There
is often divergence in the interests of workers and management which need to be
reconciled.
In actual practice compensation policies and
structures are determined
(a) unilaterally by employer in situations where the
employer could exploit the prevailing labour market situation;
(b) jointly by management and workers' union(s)
through collective bargaining;
(c) through consultations among the three partners
it government, management and labour representatives ii under the minimum wages
legislation;
(d) wage boards and pay commissions; and,
(e) courts through adjudication. (The best method is
collective bargaining.)
In companies
which are managed professionally and in a democratic manner job evaluation, employee
satisfaction surveys and compensation
surveys across companies in the industry/region provide useful inputs in
determining the policy framework. Companies
which wish to establish with performance and profitability additionally need to
have in place performance management systems with democratic goal setting pre-determined
criteria and procedure for evaluation and a transparent mechanism for
administering pay policies.
We examine the key considerations. in compensation
policy at macro and micro levels, the divergence in the interests of workers
and management
MACRO POLICY FRAMEWORK: KEY CONSIDERATIONS PUBLIC POLICY
AT MACRO LEVEL
The key considerations in
Public Policy concerning wages/salaries in India may be identified as
following:
a) End exploitation and provide
remuneration to capital and labour such that "while in the interests of the consumers and the primary producers excessive profits should
be prevented by suitable measures of taxation and otherwise. both will
share the product of their common effort after making provision for payment of
fair wages to labour, a fair return on capital employed in the industry and
reasonable reserves for the maintenance and expansion of the undertaking"
(Industrial Truce Resolution, 1947)
b) A living wage, conditions of
work ensuring a decent standard of life and full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities
..." (Constitution of India, Article 43) The Fair Wages Committee observed
that IA living wage should enable the male earner to provide for himself and
his family not merely the bare essentials of food, clothing, and shelter but a
measure of frugal comfort including education for the children, protection
against ill-health, requirements of essential needs and a measure of insurance
against the more important misfortunes including old age.
c) Fix statutory minimum wages
in sweated industries and promote fair wage agreements in the more organised
industries (Industrial Policy Resolution, 1948)
d) Ensure equal pay for equal work (Constitution of India)
e) Provide for wage differentials
f) Regulate wages and salaries to eliminate/reduce undue disparities
g) Link remuneration to productivity
h) Compensate for rise in cost of living
i) Determine fair wages over and above minimum wages with due regard
to
(i) the productivity of labour; (ii) the
prevailing level of wages; (iii) the level of national income and distribution;
and (iv) the place of industry in the economy of the country. According to the
Fair Wages Committee, &minimum wage must provide not merely for the bare
substance of life but for the preservation of the efficiency of the worker. The
minimum wage must also provide for some measure of education, medical
requirements and amenities.’?
Fair wage should be above
minimum wage and below living wage. While the lower limit of the fair wage must
obviously be the minimum wage, the upper limit is equally set by what may
broadly be called the capacity of the industry to pay.
j) The capacity to pay. However, Supreme Court ruled that `an employer who can not pay minimum wages
has no right to exist.' The capacity to pay becomes a subject of
consideration to 'determine fair wages over and above minimum wages
k) Basic needs of Labour. The 15th session of Indian Labour Conference
held in 1957 suggested that the minimum wages be need-based. The Second Central
Pay Commission, observed that need-based wages should ensure the minimum human
needs of the industrial worker irrespective of any other 'considerations.
Dr. Akroyd, Consultant to
the Second Central Pay Commission observed that
need-based minimum wages
should be determined having regard to the
following: (i) in
calculating the need-based minimum wage, the standard
working class family should
be taken to consist of
3 consumption units for one earner; the earnings of women, children and adolescents should be
disregarded; (ii) minimum food requirements should be estimated at a per
consumption of 18 yards per annum which would give for the average workers'
family of four, a total of 72 yards;
(iv) in respect of housing
the norm should be the minimum rent charged by Government in any area for
houses provided under the subsidized Industrial Housing Scheme for low income
groups; and, (v) fuel, lighting and other emiscellaneous' items of expenditure should
constitute 20 per cent of the total minimum wages.
a) Wages should be adequate, sufficient and non-derogatory (IV Central
Pay Commission).
b) The effect of wages in one sector on the rest of the economy must
be reckoned.
Practical Difficulties in
implementation
In actual practice, one
finds the following practical difficulties in implementation.
a) Many terms like minimum wage; living wage and fair wage are not
amenable for translation into money terms easily. It is difficult to
operationalise the concept of a living wage and decent standard of life. It is
not unusual to find workers, who by the measure of gross pay packet may
constitute the middle class and be reckoned as relatively affluent by local
community standards, but continue to live in abject poverty leading a
sub-standard life.
b) Minimum wages do not really matter. In the organized sector
(particularly large and medium firms) most workers get much more than the
minimum wages. In the unorganised sector, usually workers get less than the
minimum wages. Widespread unemployment and underemployment make it difficult
for even trade unions and government authorities to ensure strict compliance.
c) The wages are not exploitative in the organized sector, but they
are, usually, in the unorganised sector. In the organized sector, several firms
may be usually found wanting in terms of norms of fairness due to bargaining
pressures, etc.
d) The concept of equal pay for equal work has a very limited and
narrow application in Indian law and practice. The concept, as envisaged in the
ILO Convention No. 100 focuses on equal pay for work of equal value. It is
decided with reference to four attributes, i.e., skill, effort, responsibility
and working conditions. In practice, however, collective bargaining, government
interference and neutralization for rise in cost of living undermine the link
between pay and the four attributes mentioned above. Wage differentials within
the enterprise and across the enterprises were significantly compressed over
the years. Differences in dearness allowance payment systems created additional
disparities.
e) So far linking wages to productivity remained a far cry. In the
absence of systematic attempts at defining and measuring factor productivity
most of the existing collective arrangements were borne out of relative
bargaining power of parties and other expediencies based on short-term
considerations. The IV Central Pay Commission observed that there were many
short-comings in the conceptualisation and implementation of the productivity
linked bonus schemes. In several instances bonuses were paid without
productivity.
f) The question whether real wages are maintained or declining in the
organized sector depends on whether the reference point is the basic wage or
the total emoluments. The subject has become quite contentions on three
grounds: (i) elements and computation of index; (ii) method and degree of
neutralisation;
(iii) elements of pay
reckoned for neutralisation.
g) It is difficult to determine whether wages are adequate, sufficient
and non- derogatory. As Mahatma Gandhi observed, it is possible to pay for
one's needs, not his greed. Whether wages are non-derogatory depends also on
the occupational values in the society.
COMPANY COMPENSATION POLICY
At Micro Level Considerations)
Compensation policies need
to. be established in every . enterprise taking the following" aspects into consideration, besides
due regard to the provisions of public policy, job -evaluation and collective bargaining.
1.
ATTRACTION AND RETENTION
Usually an enterprise
endeavours to recruit and, retain the best people available. One of - the ways of attracting and retaining
the best and the brightest is to pay more than
what they would get anywhere else for similar skills and levels.'
Some firm endeavour to be wage leaders'. This deliberate
corporate strategy may create a situation of `wage
islands' which pose problems from societal point of
view.
Unlimited wage disparities
cause distortions in. the economy. Still, enterprises with prime concern for micro consideration may
adopt this strategy subject to governmental
restraints on account of national wage/income policies. Multinationals operating in developing countries
usually pay much higher than the indigenous firms in both private and public sectors.
2.
INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
Compensation policies should take into account the differentials in skills, and levels in respect of both responsibility and authority. A sense of proportion needs to be maintained to achieve internal consistency so that wage/salary levels conform to the differences .in hierarchy and skills. III-conceived differentials may lead to conflict among work groups. In a fabrication unit, after wage revision the welders were getting less than gardeners. The technical staff in the organisation resented this by sloganeering and protests: Should, grass-cutters (gardeners) get more than gas-cutters (welders)? At the macro level similar questions (e.g., should a peon in a rural bank get more than a school teacher in the same village?) arise due to occupational values in the society and skill endowment at a given stage of economic development. But at the micro level, internally within the firm, such questions need careful examination each time decisions are taken to review salary scales.
1.
EXTERNAL CONSISTENCY
The simplest and most widely
used criteria is to consider what is generally known as the going rate in the labour market for comparable jobs in the
industry/region. While deciding wage
rates in public sector, comparison may be made of wage rates in private sector for comparable jobs. It is
possible that public sector units may fix relatively
lower wage rates than private sector units because the former affords a greater -sense of job security. But if the
differentials are significant enough, public
sector may find it difficult to attract the right talent. For key jobs
if the rates are not uniform, inter
and intrasectorally and among industry groups, there may be imbalances in the distribution of skills and talents.
4 ABILITY TO PAY
As already mentioned, wherever minimum wage legislation is applicable, enterprises should pay minimum wages irrespective of their capacity to pay. Over and above the minimum wages, enterprises pay more depending upon their ability to pay. Also, enterprises vulnerable to union pressures may end up paying more than this due to the coercive bargaining power of the unions. It is not uncommon to see enterprises paying much less than what they can pay just because the employees are not organised.
5 LINKING PAY TO PERFORMANCE
Linking pay to performance
is sound and makes good sense. However in the
organised sector in India, the compensation policies have,
unfortunately, a remote relationship,
if ever, between pay and performance. Analysis of the components of total wage/salary reveals that over the
years a substantial part of the rise in the pay is intended to meet the rise in the cost of living. While basic
wage/salary and even bonus is not
usually related to performance, many enterprises have a wide range of production incentive systems.
It is important for any
organization which wishes to establish any linkage between pay and performance to design the
organization, jobs and work flow in such a manner where employees covered by the performance linked pay system
are able to make a difference to the
outcomes of their work. This means democratization of workplace with locus
control in the hands of those who perform work.
Another key problem with
linking pay with performance concerns the absence of criteria and tools to measure performance objectively and the
inability to evolve mutually satisfactory
norms of sharing the fruits of performance between labour and capital.
6. LABOUR COSTS AND PRODUCTIVITY
Wages and salaries can be linked to the productivity and profitability of an enterprise. Growing and profit-earning enterprises find it easier to pay more than stagnant and loss-incurring enterprises though it is the latter category which would be most hard pressed to attract and retain skills. Again wage costs as a percentage to total costs would be higher in labour intensive firms than capital intensive firms and in assembly-type units than in process units. For instance, in India, the labour cost as a percentage of total cost could be around 60 in coal mining against barely 2 or 3 per cent in petro- chemicals or fertilizers. In most manufacturing firms it does not exceed 15 to 16 per cent. Capital intensive process units can thus afford to pay substantially more than labour intensive units because the impact of higher wages and salaries on output costs is not so acute as in labour intensive units.
Also in recent years, productivity bargaining is gaining ground
in India too. For example, the ITC increased the pay
scales of unionised employees
substantially through wage agreement
whereby the union agreed to cooperate with the management in maintaining the share of labour cost in
the ex-factory cost per cigarette at the same
level over a five-year period. Many firms have entered into wage
agreements which entailed a trade off
between more jobs versus more wages. For example Premier Automobiles Ltd could accomplish a major productivity bargaining agreement.
Several other chemical and
engineering firms had, in recent years, "entered into similar agreements. However, such
agreements raise questions about their effects on level of employment in the economy, particularly in the context
of widespread unemployment and on the
firm in the event of a recession. The
counter argument is, "What is
the point in keeping wages low, if you can not keep the labour costs too low?" Quite often firms
in India find labour
is cheap, but not the cost of
labour.
7 COST OF LIVING
Dearness Allowance (DA) and
City Compensatory Allowance (CCA) now form integral
part of most wage structures. The general principle underlying these allowances is to neutralize at least a
portion of the increase in the cost of living.
Where these allowances do not form part of the wage structure, ad hoc
and lumpsum, increases in pay are
unilaterally announced by managements to partially provide for such neutralization. It may be observed in
certain private sector organizations which follow
both the systems, the ad hoc pay increases are (usually for staff and managerial employees) at least equal to
the increase in DA sanctioned to those governed
by the DA scheme (usually workmen) since the time ad hoc pay increase was sanctioned last till the current ad
hoc pay increase. Wage and salary increase related
to increase in cost of living usually poses additional burden on the employer without corresponding improvement in
productivity. The additional financial burden
is met by adjusting
the prices, if the market can bear and public
policy allows.
Otherwise the pressure is on firms to cut costselsewhere or seek productivity improvements to absorb the increase in wage costs.
8 MERIT AND SENIORITY PROGRESSION
Merit progression refers
to the practice of rewarding a person according to one's
When the person's performance is outstanding or
distinctively above average, the organization
may like to reward him with extra (over and above the normal) increment(s). There are, of course, other
less used ways of rewarding merit/superior performance. These include, production incentive and profit-sharing schemes, bonus, promotions, job enlargement and job enrichment.
Usually most pay-scales provide
for step increases over a time scale. Annual
increments in basic pay accrue to the employee as he accumulates
experience till he reaches the end of
the pay scale. Some organizations provide for time bound promotions and stagnation allowances too. Time-bound promotions
refer to the practice of promotion to
the next grade after the person completes service in the present grade for a specified number of years. Stagnation
allowance refers to the practice of sanctioning extra increments or lumpsum amount
after the person
reaches the end of the pay-scale.
As a result of the above
practices, the senior employees get more pay (higher basic and consequential increases in other
benefits like DA, Provident Fund, etc., which are usually expressed as a fraction or. percentage of basic pay)
than their juniors even though both would be doing same or similar work. The logic for seniority progression is that as a person
accumulates experience, his skills get sharpened and productive efficiency goes up. This may, in jobs requiring
manual skill and dexterity continue
to happen only up to a point and thereafter, because of age, and other considerations, the productive efficiency
may decline. In jobs requiring mental skills
(teaching, for instance), there may not be any similiarly evident
saturation or declining point unless the person becomes senile.
9. MOTIVATION
"Money may not be everything but everything else may be way behind!" Company compensation policy can be an effective tool to motivate people for superior performance. There is a lot of debate on whether after a point money ceases to be a motivating factor, due to several reasons such as individual preferences, consequential trade offs (in terms of family and social obligations, etc), taxation policies, etc. A wide variety of non-monetary incentives have therefore been devised to compensate, reward, sustain and improve superior performance.10.
INTEGRITY
James Burnham predicted in his famous book, Managerial Revolution, which he wrote half-a-century ago, that the future belongs to professional managers who would be the `rulers'. Berle and Means pointed out the divorce between ownership and control, in their well-acclaimed book, "The Rise of the Modern Corporation". Now, professional managers have access to and control over resources. They do not, of course, usually own them. As we have seen in Chapter 4, integrity has been identified as one of the most important attributes in selection criteria for managerial employees who wield control over corporate resources. Having given them the power, there are many like the veteran civil servant L K Jha, who argued that it is important to compensate them adequately enough to keep them out of temptation, L K Jha once asked, "whether we can afford not to pay more for civil servants who wield such enormous power?" The question is indeed ticklish. To paraphrase Mahatma Gandhi, companies can give enough to meet a person's needs and to let him lead a life befitting the position he occupies, but no company can give a person enough to meet his greed.
DIVERGENT PERSPECTIVES OF MANAGEMENT AND LABOUR

Comments
Post a Comment